8:21 am

April 2, 2018

Seems to me I'm missing something very essnetial with these basic single pole filters.

I've implemnted the LPF example on p.164-5 and recevied a satisfactory result, i.e. zero (db) gain at low frequencies and (-6 db) attenuation slope at higher than cutoff frequencies.

However, when I implement the HPF example, I get a high-frequency attenuation which is not the expected with some energy loss at low frequncies.

When dialing in the HPF values, I was expecting a zero (dB) gain at high frequencies and -6 db attenuation slope at sub-cutoff frequencies. That' s not what I receive on the FR graph. What am I doing wrong ?

**Here is the code:**

**//Design equation calculation (Fc = 100, Fs = 44100, Pi = 3.14159 approx.)**

*float Theta = 2 * 3.14159 * 100 / 44100;*

* float T = 2 - cos(Theta);*

* float b1 = sqrt(T*T - 1) - T;*

* float a0 = 1 + b1;*

**//Turn stereo to mono (just for convinience and simplicity)**

*float x = 0.5 * (pInputBuffer[1] + pInputBuffer[0]);*

**//Difference equation**

*float y = a0 * x - b1 * yn;*

**//Iterate**

yn = y;

**//Output**

*pOutputBuffer[0] = y;*

* pOutputBuffer[1] = y;*

*return true;*

=====================

Yn is declared as float in the *.h file and zero'd on 'prepare to play' function. It does work for LPF...

11:31 am

January 29, 2017

Yes this is actually the correct result. The one-pole filter works fine to implement a low-pass variety and produces a finite gain at Nyquist.

A 1st order HPF, analog or digital, necessarily requires a zero at DC to pull the DC response all the way down to nothing at 0Hz. The one-pole HPF does not have this zero and therefore will never be able to do much more than make a bit of a LF shelf.

I should note that Figure 6.2 is erroneous. It was not supposed to go along with the one-pole LPF. It was supposed to go with the 1st order BZT LPF instead (I'm working on a new edition that fixes this). The one-pole LPF does not have a zero at Nyquist so its response is actually closer to that of an analog filter. Likewise, the one-pole HPF does not have a zero at DC that it requires. Both of those are actually very early audio filter designs and in my new edition I am actually omitting the HPF version as it doesn't have that required zero.

- Will

Most Users Ever Online: 55

Currently Online:

3 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:

1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Skyler: 48

Derek: 46

Frodson: 45

Peter: 41

clau_ste: 39

Gwen: 32

JimmyM: 30

TheSmile: 28

EZB: 24

lppier: 23

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1

Members: 536

Moderators: 1

Admins: 4

Forum Stats:

Groups: 11

Forums: 31

Topics: 559

Posts: 2192

Newest Members:

Third Audio, LRT, TomJ, Giscard, Alejandro Florez, Tomaso, Jonas, Ralph, Wayne, Steve DuellModerators: W Pirkle: 267

Administrators: Tom: 67, JD Young: 80, Will Pirkle: 0, W Pirkle: 267